| This is the talk page for discussing changes and improvements to the Battle of Tiberian article. |
|---|
| Please add only comments specific to this article here. Broader discussions belong on the Community Portal or the Editing Conventions Discussion. The place for general discussion about the source material is the Forum.
Also, please add new topics at the end and sign your comments with four tildes. (~~~~) |
The Battle of Tiberian is described in detail in the short story "The Service of the Sword".
Haicheng Ringstorff[]
What about Mr. H.R., a Mesan superior? At least he initiated battle.--dotz 20:58, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
- Ringstorff is a difficult case... do we have any information as to wether he was a part of any "military" chain of command? Sure, he was "in command" of the operation, but we wouldn't put Baroness Medusa up as the commander of First Basilisk, either, would we? -- SaganamiFan 12:07, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- Specific case - he ordered to destroy Star Warrior and Gauntlet, as well as to kill pinnacle crew, but he didn't commanded personnaly, especially during quite complex battle against Gauntlet.--dotz 22:06, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- And statement based on directly quotation - Ringstorff was in charge of Manpower's Tiberian operation, including use of Four Yahoos' cruisers, whatever it meant in detail.--dotz 20:30, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Specific case - he ordered to destroy Star Warrior and Gauntlet, as well as to kill pinnacle crew, but he didn't commanded personnaly, especially during quite complex battle against Gauntlet.--dotz 22:06, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
ENS Star Warrior[]
What about destruction of Erewhonese destroyer - incident? --dotz 20:49, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- It is mentioned in the "Prelude" section. Wasn't part of the batte itself, so that should be enough. We have no information of exactly when and how the destruction of the ship took place, so the few bits and pieces of information are better of in the ship's article then anywhere else, in my opinion. -- SaganamiFan 11:58, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- I think Star Warrior wasn't destroyed instantly, so we have two battles of Tiberian, or Star Warrior affair is incident, not a battle.--dotz 22:06, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- Technically I'd call it a battle, but since we have no details, for now we can list it in the prelude, since it was the pretense for the Gauntlet heading to the system. But I wouldn't object to it being listed as a battle. Jabrwock 22:27, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- I wouldn't object to it being listed as a incident :)--dotz 22:34, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- Technically I'd call it a battle, but since we have no details, for now we can list it in the prelude, since it was the pretense for the Gauntlet heading to the system. But I wouldn't object to it being listed as a battle. Jabrwock 22:27, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- I think Star Warrior wasn't destroyed instantly, so we have two battles of Tiberian, or Star Warrior affair is incident, not a battle.--dotz 22:06, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
200 captured and 300 killed[]
SI2? Where?
Marine complement on unit belonging to Manpower Incorporated (Predator) reached three hundred troops. --dotz 19:05, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
To answer your question. is when LT Fonzerelli is 'counseling' O'really over her language about Hearns.John964 20:22, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
Marine complement on unit belonging to Manpower Incorporated (Predator) reached five hundred troops. Real marine carrier. thx--dotz 08:02, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
A marine complement of 500 is not out of the realm of possability the RMN's Star Knight class carried a full battalion of around 400-500 marines. IIRC Guantlet carried a single company of 140 marines and a battalion with 3 companies and a HQ plattoon would be about 450 marines and with the SLN's more manpower intensive designs.John964 23:32, March 28, 2011 (UTC)